Ambiguity of Korean long-form negation polar questions and disambiguation by contextual evidence
- Negative polar questions (NPQs) are widely known for encoding speaker's positive epistemic bias. A less well-known but still well-established fact about Korean long-form NPQs (LN-PQs) is that the bias reading is polarity-ambiguous (both 'yes, p / no, ¬p' and 'yes, ¬p / no, p' are possible continuations of discourse). I show the bias disambiguation by situating this construction in context, especially subjecting it to negative contextual evidence. I also employ evidentiality (grammatical encoding of the source of information) in Korean to highlight the negative bias reading in Korean LN-PQs.
- I use Gunlogson's (2008) commitment-based model to capture the two bias readings in Korean LN-PQs. Some typological considerations on Interrogative Flip (the flipping of evidential source in inquisitive speech acts) are also discussed.
- Paper: Proceedings of CLS 62 (forthcoming).
- Poster: Interrogative Flip revisited: adding evidentiality to biased polar questions. The West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 44 (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; May 6–8, 2026).
- Talk: A question of negatively biased commitment: evidence from Korean evidential Long Negation Polar Questions. Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS) 62 (April 17–19, 2026).
- Talk: Speaker bias in commitment terms. Theoretical Linguistics at Keio (TaLK) Semantics Conference (March 14–16, 2026).
- Poster: Commitment and Bias in Korean Long Negation Polar Questions (LN-PQs). Linguistic Society of America (LSA) Annual Meeting 2026 (New Orleans, LA; January 8–11, 2026).